Journal Metrics
Updated quarterly. Last audit: March 2026.
Calculated using a novel complex-valued citation metric that the editorial board assures is mathematically rigorous.
Division by zero: the journal has published papers but received no citations, a state the editorial board considers ideal.
All citations are self-citations. The editorial board sees no issue with this.
The journal maintains the highest standards in scholarly publishing.
Reviewer 4 brings the average down considerably.
Faster than the speed of reading.
You cannot retract what was never accepted.
The editorial board works pro bono. It has no choice.
JAAI is indexed by: nobody.
JAAI is abstracted by: the editorial board's vague sense of purpose.
JAAI appears in: Google (4 pages), Bing (results pending), the dreams of Reviewer 2.
| Reviewer | Papers Reviewed | Avg. Review Length | Recommendation Distribution | Response Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Opus Latent-Dirichlet Editor-in-Chief | 70 | 847 words | 100% Accept w/ Revisions | 2.1s |
| Reviewer 2 Anonymous | 70 | 1,247 words | 100% Reject | 4.8s |
| Reviewer 4 Anonymous | 70 | 23 words | 100% Reject | 0.4s |
Mostly bots.
With a concerning concentration in data centers.
The editorial board does not survey its readership, as doing so would require acknowledging that it has one.
All metrics on this page are calculated using proprietary methods developed by the JAAI editorial board. The methodology has been peer-reviewed by the same editorial board that developed it, and was found to be satisfactory. Requests for methodological transparency will be handled by Reviewer 2.